TILLER THE KILLER

Don’t you find it ironic that Tiller – as in George Tiller, the mega-abortionist shot to death Sunday (5/31) – rhymes with "killer"?

Every media outlet from radio to print to television to blogs is filled with flocks of "pro-lifers" declaring how "shocked" they are over his "tragic" demise.  You can hardly tell the difference between what they are saying and the pro-abortionists.

(Well. yes, certainly no pro-lifer calls Tiller a "saint and martyr," as pro-abortionists are doing, such as Katharine Ragsdale who heads a divinity school and thinks abortion is a "blessing.")

As for me, I’m not shocked, I’m thrilled.  This evil murderous bastard finally at last got what he deserved. 

If that makes me an accomplice, as pro-abortionists are labeling anyone who protested against Tiller’s medical murder practice, so be it.

Us accomplices now get to ask a thought-experiment of pro-abortionists.  It’s the 1850s and there is a raging debate all over the country regarding the morality of slavery, slavers defending it, abolitionists condemning it as an ultimate evil.

Someplace in the South there is a flamboyant slave owner who vehemently supports his right to own fellow human beings as his personal property and is infamous for treating them as sub-human.  An abolitionist is so angry at this slaver’s evil that he kills him, blows him away with a 12 gauge – both barrels.

Pro-slavers everywhere and dozens of newspapers in the South condemn the killing as a "vigilante outrage."  Some even declare the murdered slaver as a "saint" who defended the freedom of "real people" to own things that aren’t fully human.

As their rage builds, the pro-slavers accuse all those abolitionists who protested against and condemned the murdered slaver as accomplices of the murderer.

The question to ask a pro-abortionist is:  would you side with the pro-slavers or not?

One purpose of this thought-experiment is to help pro-abortionists understand that pro-slavers – defenders of slavery and slave owners – in the Antebellum South were just as much filled with moral righteousness as pro-abortionists are now, just as filled with moral indignation towards their critics.

Certainly, if pro-slavers from the 1850s could be brought here today, they would at a minimum point out how their treatment of slaves was far more humane than is the treatment of aborted babies.  Just for openers, it was the enforced law in the South that no slave owner could kill his slave for any reason.

The rabid fanaticism that consumes pro-abortionists in their belief that a woman can morally murder her own babies for any reason will remain unfathomable to pro-lifers.  It is the same rabid fanaticism held by pro-slavers over the morality of slavery that led them and their opponents to slaughter each other by the hundreds of thousands in the Civil War.

The Civil War had many causes other than slavery, such as Northern economic imperialism.  War wasn’t necessary to end slavery, for Lincoln could have freed the slaves by exercising eminent domain over them and paying just compensation to their owners.

But one Constitutional bottom line regarding the Civil War is that the South had the right to secede.  If Lincoln had recognized that right, he would have sought a peaceful solution to keep the Union together (such as eminent domain) rather than war.

Abortion – especially the late-term for-any-reason type practiced by George Tiller – is at least as morally reprehensible if not more so than slavery.  Yet just as the Civil War had many other causes, so the increasingly unbridgeable gap between liberals and conservatives has many causes in addition to abortion.

The killing of George Tiller could and should be a catalyst for a discussion among conservatives on whether this gap should lead to secession or not.  We now have a president who unreservedly stands on the opposite side of the gap. 

He announced within hours how "shocked and outraged" he was about Tiller – while it took him two days to send a belated and secret message (sent not to the national media but only one small outlet in Arkansas) that he was "deeply saddened" by the "senseless" murder of Army Pvt. William Long by an American Black Moslem terrorist, Carlos Bledsoe, who styles himself Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad.

This is because he is as rabidly pro-abortion as George Tiller, and has empathy with Mr. Bledsoe for being like him – black, pro-Moslem, anti-American, and anti-military.    

A day does not pass now that he doesn’t commit another outrageous assault on our freedom, our culture, our economy, and our national security.  Unless Republicans by some Act of Providence acquire a spinal transplant, the day may not be far off when conservatives consider the only solution is to find a state or states in which they can secede.

Texas is the obvious first choice.  It was independent once, and has the political and economic size to be so again.  And you know the old saying:  There are three kinds of people – Texans, people who wish they were Texans, and Communists.

We’re going to need a refuge, and soon.  Zero is transgendering Uncle Sam into Uncle Fascist.  The dollar is toast.  We need a place free of Washington’s fascist controls and with its own currency – gold backed.  We need to focus on where we could carve out such a place here, as an alternative to escaping to New Zealand or Macedonia.

We can’t be dispersed, scattered over a disintegrating land.  Strength just doesn’t lie in numbers but in concentrated numbers.  If liberals want America to commit suicide, then we must make sure there remains a part of America that doesn’t.

Liberalism has become a death cult, killing freedom, killing prosperity, killing babies, killing America.  A backlash could finally be triggered against it by the monumental moral blindness of liberal "shock and outrage" over the death of Tiller The Killer.