The Oasis for
Rational Conservatives

The Amazon’s Pantanal
Serengeti Birthing Safari
Wheeler Expeditions
Member Discussions
Article Archives
L i k e U s ! ! !
TTP Merchandise

THE GREAT UN-COMMUNICATOR

Download PDF

You’ve got to hand it to President Bush.  For a pretty decent, straightforward guy, he sure has a knack for making enemies. 

The economy is booming.  There has been no successful terrorist attack in the United States since Sept. 11, 2001.  Al Qaeda officials acknowledge we’re winning the war in Iraq.  Yet in the history of polling, only three presidents have had job approval ratings as low or lower than President Bush does now.

They were Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter just before they left office, and Harry Truman after he had fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur.  Mr. Bush is about where Mr. Carter was (34 percent), but still has a ways to fall to reach the nadirs of Nixon (24 percent) and Truman (23 percent).  Will he?

The president’s popularity problem isn’t one problem, but three.

Nearly all Democrats, most independents, and a third of Republicans now disapprove of the job President Bush is doing, but they have different reasons for doing so.

Democrats disapprove of Mr. Bush chiefly because he beat them in 2000, 2002, and 2004.  Democrats are against whatever Mr. Bush is for, even if this involves ferocious flip-flopping on their part.

Madeleine Albright, who was secretary of state under President Clinton, illustrated Democratic malleability of principle in a speech in Seattle this week.

The major criticism Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry had made of President Bush’s Iraq policy was it’s alleged "unilateralism."  The president is attempting to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions through UN Security Council action.  So Ms. Albright called for unilateral negotiations with Iran. 

To Democrats, no policy is more important than opposition to what President Bush is for, even if it’s what Democrats said they were for yesterday.

Independents are unhappy with (the apparent lack of) progress in the war in Iraq, and the price of gasoline.

Republicans are upset about illegal immigration, and runaway government spending.

Even though I like the guy personally, and have only one serious policy disagreement with him (the prescription drug program is unaffordable, and has been a political disaster), I’m one of those giving a thumbs down.

The president (mostly) does the right thing, but does a poor job of communicating why it’s the right thing to do.  That’s a big failing in a president.  Ronald Reagan was the Great Communicator.  It seems that George Bush is the Great Un-Communicator.

Immigration could split the GOP.  Conservatives — and not just conservatives– are incensed that our laws are not being enforced.

Most Americans support what the president says he’s for — stiffer border enforcement  — but they don’t believe the president is serious about actually controlling our borders.

Border enforcement has stiffened in the last year, but Mr. Bush continues to send the wrong signals.  He’s referred to the Minutemen, the civilians who patrol the borders, as "vigilantes."  A report this week that the Border Patrol is informing the Mexicans of the locations of Minutemen patrols is the sort of thing that makes the base seethe with rage.

The president should express sympathy for the Minutemen, if not for all of their policy ideas.  He should visit the ranchers whose property is being overrun, and listen to their stories.  He should embrace the enforcement provisions in the House bill. 

If he does so, he’d get both a comprehensive immigration policy and a rebound in the polls.  But if he continues to give the impression he’s unconcerned about enforcement, Mr. Bush’s popularity could plummet to Nixonian levels.